Rabu, 02 April 2014

Critique of skinner’s theories



Critique of skinner’s theories
Because skinner did not address classroom management in his work,he also did not addres the instrucsional implications of his theory and did not show the relationship between management amd instrucion.most effective classroom educators realize the importance of combining effective management with good teaching and believe that it is difficult to have one without the other.
Looking specifically at the behavioral aspect of operant conditioning,not all classroom management theorists agree with skinner’s ideas about rewards.in fact some believe reward are counter productive because they are extinsic bribes rather than internal motivation.  

As Alfie kohn explains,the more people receive rewardsfor doing something,the more likely it becomes that they will lose the intrinsic motivation to continue the behavior that produced the reward.thus,when a stdudent works for the extrincis reward reather than the inrinsic reward.other educators believe that student might firts be motivated by extrinsic motivation begins to disappear and the individual learn to perform the behavior solely to get the reward.other educators believe that students might first be motivation by extrinsic reward,but they eventually will perform the desired behaviors without the reward or with only anintermittent reward.in other words,as the behaior is shaped,the motivation becomes intinsic rather than extinsic.other criticisms of skinner’s behaviorist the theories arise from a general dissatisfaction with any theory that believes punishment is ineffective and that positive reinforcement is better.
How might skinner’s theories fare in our nation’s increasingly diverse school as educators strive to address cultural group,socioeconomic class,geographical region,or devel opmental period can vary significantly.however,different groups can,in general,have certain characteristics that teacher need to consider in the classroom.
Although educators generally believe that competition improves behavior and achievement,the opposite might be true for some cultural groups.for example,manning and baruth explained that some latinos or hispanic americans might avoid any competition or activity that sets them apart from their group.for some latinos to stand out among their peers is to place themselves in considerable jeopardy and is to be avoided at all costs.other people believe competition means that someone has to excel at someone else’s expense.extrinsic reward such as a homework pass,token,or stiker might be seen as a personal affront to someone who did not receive one.also feminists are concerned that the reward system is unfair to females,who sometimes place value on collaboration rather than competition to receive reward.
Overview of redl’s and wattenberg’s theories
In mental hygiene teaching,redl and wattenberg offered several theories that have contributed to classroom management concept and provided the foundational work for many later theorists.their explaination of group dynamics or group life in the classroom has particular relevance to today’s educators,who need to understand that individual behavior affects group behavior,and vice versa.in addition they indetified management strategies,including the techniques of supporting self-control,situasional assistance,reality apprasial and the pleasure-pain principle,which educators can use to influence student behavior.
In discussing group dynamics,redl and wattenberg noted that differences occur in the behavior of a student as an individual and the behavior of the same student as a member of a group.within a group,they found that individuals assume roles,including leader,clown or entertainer,fall guy or blame taker,and instigator.they also identified group actions such as contagious behavior that individuals assume roles,including actions such as contagious behavior that spreads throught the group members scape goating or blaming a weak or unliked individual reactions to strangers,wich usually cause tension throughout the group teasing the teachers pet or showing a negative or the breakup of the group.
Readl and wattenberg also identified a number of influence techniques that educators can use to manage behavior in aa classroom.their technique pf supporting self control is based on the beliefe that individuals control their own conduct and that much meisbehavior result from a temporary lapse of an individuals control system rather than from a motivation to be disagreeable.another mainstay of redls and wattenbergs theories is the concept of appraising realty,or realty appraisal.they maintaned that students need to appraise realty in an effort  to understand whether their actions are guieded by intellingence and conscience or by fear or prejudice.to guide students,educators should appeal to students sense of fairness and also “strengthen their ability to see the consequences of their actions”.
Two other influence techniques are the pleasure-pain principle and the concept of situational assitance.if a student hast lost his or her self-control,a teacher steps in with situational assitance to help the student regain control.when using the pleasure-pain principle the teacher deliberately provides experiences to produce plesant to unpleasant feelings.in able behavior,and an unpleasant experience will induce an individual to reapeat a desiring that unwanted behavior.however,redl wattenberg make it clear that this pleasure-pain principle does not mean that a teacher,in the heat of anger,can lash out at a student.likewise,pain or punishment should not be in the form of revange.
Contribution of reidl and wattenberg theories
With their study of group life,redl and wattenberg contributed to our understanding of the ways students function as members of groups within classroom and the effect that groupe expectations have on individual group members.a worthwhile project for any teacher is to obesrve the groups within the classroom,as well as within the total classroom group,in order to identify the roles being played by each of the student.it is also important for a teacher to be awere of group behaviors such as the tension that often accompanies the entrence of a stranger into a room or the hostility over a percieved pet,or favorite,student.a perceptive teacher is awere of the functioning of the class as a whole group,as well as of each smaller group within the clasroom and monitors the actions of each group and its members.
In addition to their work on group dynamics,redl and wattenberg identified many influence principles that are important for educators.most students want to behave appropriately,but they sometimes need help contolling their actions.perhaps because they forget,are uncertain about the rules,are bored or are just tired of sitting,some students lose self-control and need the teachers assistance.often this assistence can be minimal and can help student regain or keep from losing their control.at other times,situational assistance requires more action on the part of the educator.although this asstance can take many forms,redl and wattendberg cautioned that corporal punishment can accomplish nothing that cannot be achieved better by some other methood.although this attitude is not unusual today,redl and wattenberg position probably resulted in considerable criticism when it was stated originaly.figure 2-1 provides several examples of ways teacher can help student control their own action and provide situational assistance.
In addition to helping students deal with their behavior in an individual situation,educators can use several strategies to help student learn to appraise or understand reality.for example,teacher can use direct appeals an explain to student the connection between their conduct and its consequences.they also can use criticism and encouragement,wich can be done in private or within thee hearing range of the entire class.in addition,educators can cleary define classroom and school limits.one advantage of appraising reality is that these techniques help student developed the values and the feel for realty that should govern their behavior.activity 2-2 offers you can opportunity to developed some questionsthat you might ask to encourage students to appraise realty.
Aaplication of redl’s and wattenberg’s theories   
Redls and wattenbergs theories have contributed significantly to classroom management and to ideas about god teaching.unlike skinner,who looked only at the psychological aspects of behavior,redl and wattenberg focused on aspect of classroom management that have the potentionalfor improving instructional practices as well.understanding group dynamic,providing situational assistance,and supporting self control relate to effective management practices and to good teaching.redl and wattenberg realized the difficulty of having effective management without good teaching and built upon the connection and realitionship between the two.
The following are some of ways teacher have followed or disregarded redls and wattenbergs theories.after reading them,use these theories to respond to the situation in i low would you react 2-2.
When ellen pandorski began her student teaching,she had a rule that student had to raise their hand to answer one of her question.that way,she could call on the right person.however,as the school year progressed,cory began to answer question without raising his hand.because ms.pamdorski thought the rule infraction.soon,other student began to call out answer,many of wich we wrong.then ms.pandorski made another mistake.knowing cory usually had the right answer she allowed him to continue but reprimanded other who called out.not only did this take time away from isntruction,it led other student to resent cory and call him the teacher pet.red and wattenberg would have explained the group dynamic of this situation to ms.pandorski by stressing that misbehaviors can spread. Once one student initates the first inappropriate behavior.
Managing tammi’s behavior
Redl and wattenberg had serveral ideas dealing with group dynamics,supporting self control,realty appraisal,situasional assistance and the pleasure pain principle.think about these as you read the following scenario.
Ms. Caprio does not have any problems with tammis academic achievement in fact,tammi frequently finishes her work before other in her class and it is usually correct.what ms.caprio does have a problem with is tammis behavior.because she is one of the first to finish class work,tammis startsto tal,giggle,and distrubs others.knowing that something must be done about tammis behavior,ms.caprio has considered giving tammi more work,calling her parents,or moving her to an other part of the classroom.
Which of the ideas of readl and wattenberg could ms.caprio use with tammi ? justify your decision and explain how ms caprio could implement thes ideas.
In addition,this group resented the favored treatment shown to cory.thus,a small management problem grewand impacted the instruction in the classroom.
Gabe sanchez is teacher who supports self control and helps student maintain appropriate behavior.during whole group instrution,he constantly observers the entire class for signs of misbehavior with a goal,whenever possible,of correctingmisbehavior without verbally correcting the student.when mr.sanchez notices something,such as a student playing with a game isntead of paying attention to the lesson,he catches the student eye and maintains eye contact for a few momens.usually,letting the student know that he is awere of the behavior is enough.when it is not,without interrupting his intruction,mr.sanchez walks to the student side and continues talking to the class.this is usually sufficient for the student to put the game away and begin concentrating the classroom inctruction.
Gail tarron,a ninth grade spanish teacher,encourages students to appraise reality in an effort to change their behaviors.after on class,she questioned four girls to get them to realize how their cliquish behaviors affected other in the clique as well as the entire class.rather than traying to break up the group or seat them in different parts of the classroom,she sougght to show them effects of their behavior on their learning and on other student in the class.
Crituque of redls and wattenbergs theories
in spite of the contibutions of redl and wattenberg theoris and potential they hold for helping teacher manage classroom,several drawbacks should be mentioned.the proposal that teacher look student in the eye as a means of supporting self control can be unconfortable and  insulting for student of some cultures,especially those who have been taught that such behavior shows disprespet.for example,some african american childern and adolescents and members of some american indian tribes consider looking and adult or authorty figure in the eye to be rude or discourteous.thus,for some student in  the  eye as means of supporting sel control could be disconcerting to the student rather than being helpful.
Also,it can be dangerous for a teacher to use phsycal proximity,such as standing near a student or touching a student on the shoulder,especially when student feel they been threatened or touched in a harmful manner.in addition,althougt student in some cultural groups might prefer standing close to other,student of other cultural groups mighht consider close proximity to be threatining and even insullting.
Another problem is  that,althought understanding group life in the classroom im importanr,a teacher might not know appropriate management techniques to use with a group,and a situatuion can get out of hand.
In one school,a clique of intellectually bright and motivated girls shunned all others,but they significantly influenced the class by spreading rumors,as a group,they were leaders,yet the velues they advocated were not always best for the class,nor were they conducive to positive classroom behavior.althougth the teacher identified the group dynamics in motion,he did not know how to help the group members realize the negative effect of  their behaviors or to encourage them to change.
Redls and wattenbergs theories provide aan understanding of the girls roles,but determining the appropriate management actions is difficult and requires considerable skill.finally,redl and wattenberg wrote prior to the safe schools movement.schools have always had bullies and fight but the level of violence faced by educators in the 21st century was not prevalent in  the mid 1900s.however,even thoughtredl and wattenberg did not adress the issue of safety in school,their theories,such as group life in the classroom heve potential for promoting safe schools.
Thus,even with these criticims,redls and wattenbergs management theories are sound and support good instructional practices.providing situational assistance,supporrting self control,and understanding group dynamics are important for classroom management and isntruction.
William Glasser
 Overview of glasser theories
Working primarily juvenile offenders,william glasser at first based most of his writings on freudian psychoanalytic,but he later switched to a more behavioral approach that focused on helping people look to present coonditions to find solutions to problems.glasser is well known fpr his realty therapy and control theory but  his choise theory seems to have the most relevance for educators who are interested in classroom managment.glasser believedd that students have specific human needs and motives and should accept responsibilty for their behavior.he also changed the terminology from control theory because he found choice theory to be a better and more positve sounding name.
Choice theory,according to glsser is based upon the beliefe that the only person whose behavior we can control is our own.the psychology of external contorol psychology destroys humamn relationships and pervents individuals from getting along with each other.in contrast,choice theory explains that adults and childern choose to do everything they do.from birth to death,people behave in specific ways,based upon  their choice of behavior,or what they thinkis most appropriate at the time.because the only behavior we can control is our own,it is only the closeness of  the relatinship that a parent or teacher has with a child that will lead to a change in that student maladaptive or destructive behavior.
To glasser,student are driven by five basic psychological needs :
The need for survival,the need to belong,the need for power,the need for freedom,and the need for fun.once teacher meet these psychological needs,student will choose to demontrate appropriate behavior result.using coercion or external controls,whether reward or punishment is harmful because the student are not choosing their behavior,their are changing behavior to get the reward or avoid the punishment.glasser believes that coerction does not work and should be replaced with choice theory.
  

Selasa, 07 Januari 2014

PERAN MANUSIA DI DALAM LINGKUNGAN

Manusia mempunyai peranan dalam pembentukan dan perusakan ekosistem. Peranan manusia dalam pembentukan ekosistem adalah pembentukan ekosistem buatan seperti danau, waduk, persawahan dan bendungan. Sedangkan peranan manusia dalam perusakan lingkungan, misalnya pencemaran lingkungan. Pencemaran lingkungan adalah masuknya bahan organik atau anorganik kedalam lingkungan yang dapat mengganggu atau membahayakan organisme dilingkungan tersebut. Pencemaran lingkungan dapat dibagi menjadi empat, yaitu pencemaran tanah, air, udara dan suara. Berikut akan dibahas masing-masing pencemaran.
A. Pencemaran Air
Di dalam tata kehidupan manusia, air banyak memegang peranan penting antara lain untuk minum, memasak, mencuci dan mandi. Di samping itu air juga banyak diperlukan untuk mengairi sawah, ladang, industri, dan masih banyak lagi. Pencemaran air adalah masuknya bahan pencemar kedalam lingkungan air. Tindakan manusia dalam pemenuhan kegiatan sehari-hari, secara tidak sengaja telah menambah jumlah bahan anorganik pada perairan dan mencemari air.
Dampak pemcemaran air antara lain:
  • Perubahan warna, bau, dan rasa
  • Perubahan Ph
  • Eutrofikasi
  • Timbulnya endapan Koloid
Peran manusia mengatasi pencemaran air dapat dilakukan antara lain:
  • Mengelola limbah cair industri dan rumah tangga sebelum dibuang ke perairan
  • Tidak membuang sampah keperairan atau selokan
  • Tidak membuang pestisida keperairan

B. Pencemaran Tanah
Tanah merupakan tempat hidup berbagai jenis tumbuhan dan makhluk hidup lainnya termasuk manusia. Bahan yang dapat mencemari tanah dapat dibedakan menjadi dua yaitu polutan yang dapat diuraikan secara alami (degadrable) oleh dekomposer, misalnya sisa hewan dan tumbuhan , dan polutan yang tidak mudah atau tidak dapat diuraikan (nonbiodegradable) secara alami, misalnya pestisida, logam, plastik, kaleng dan buangan limbah lainnya.
Polutan  nondegradable dapat menyebabkan kualitas tanah menurun. Turunnya kualitas tanah terjadi karena bahan-bahan tersebut mengganggu kehidupan didalam tanah terutama aktivitas mikroba pengurai (dekomposer). Jika  hal ini terjadi terus menerus, tanah akan kehilangan produktifitasnya (tidak dapat digunakan untuk pertanian). Akibatnya akan menyulitkan manusia untuk memenuhi kebutuhan pangan.
Peran manusia  mengatasi pencemaran tanah:
  • Memilah sampah yang mudah terurai dan sulit terurai
  • Sampah organik  digunakan untuk kompos
  • sampah anorganik dapat didaur ulang lagi
  • Penyuluhan tentang pengolahan sampah kepada masyarakat
  • Membuang sampah pada tempat yang disediakan
  • Penggunaan pestisida buatan dikurangi dan diganti pestisida alami
  • Mengolah limbah industri sebelum dibuang
C. Pencemaran Udara
Udara dikatakan tercemar jika udara tersebut mengandung unsur-unsur yang mengotori udara. Bentuk pencemar udara bermacam-macam, ada yang berbentuk gas dan ada yang berbentuk partikel cair atau padat.
Pencemar Udara Berbentuk Gas
Beberapa gas dengan jumlah melebihi batas toleransi lingkungan, dan masuk ke lingkungan udara, dapat mengganggu kehidupan makhluk hidup. Pencemar udara yang berbentuk gas adalah karbon monoksida, senyawa belerang (SO2 dan H2S), seyawa nitrogen (NO2), dan chloroflourocarbon (CFC).
Pencemar Udara Berbentuk Partikel Cair atau Padat
Partikel yang mencemari udara terdapat dalam bentuk cair atau padat. Partikel dalam bentuk cair berupa titik-titik air atau kabut. Kabut dapat menyebabkan sesak napas jika terhiap ke dalam paru-paru. Partikel dalam bentuk padat dapat berupa debu atau abu vulkanik. Selain itu, dapat juga berasal dari makhluk hidup, misalnya bakteri, spora, virus, serbuk sari, atau serangga-serangga yang telah mati.
Dampak Pencemaran:
Pembakaran bahan bakar minyak dan batubara pada kendaraan bermotor dan industri menyebabkan naiknya kadar CO2 di udara. Gas ini juga dihasilkan dari kebakaran hutan. gas CO2 ini akan berkumpul di atmosfer Bumi. Jika jumlahnya sangat banyak, gas CO2 ini akan menghalangi pantulan panas dari Bumi ke atmosfer sehingga panas akan diserap dan dipantulkan kembali ke Bumi. Akibatnya, suhu di Bumi menjadi lebih panas. Keadaan ini disebut efek rumah kaca (green house effect). Selain gas CO2, gas lain yang menimbulkan efek rumah kaca adalah CFC yang berasal dari aerosol, juga gas metan yang berasal dari pembusukan kotoran hewan. Efek rumah kaca dapat menyebabkan suhu lingkungan menjadi naik secara global, atau lebih dikenal dengan pemanasan global.
Peran manusaia mengatasi pencemaran udara antara lain:
  • Mengurangi pemakaian bahan bakar fosil
  • Dilakukan usaha untuk mendata dan membatasi jumlah kendaraan bermotor yang layak beroperasi.
  • Mengurangi penggunaan penggunaan CFC sehingga dapat mencegah rusaknya lapisan ozon di atmosfer sehingga dapat mengurangi pemanasan global.
  • Mengadakan reboisasi
  • Mencegah penebangan hutan secara liar
  • Menggunakan bahan bakar alternatif yang ramah   lingkungan.
D. Pencemaran Suara
Sumber pencemaran suara adalah suara bising. Suara bising merupakan bunyi yang tidak diinginkan dari suatu kegiatan dalam tingkat dan waktu tertentu yang dapat mengganggu manusia dan kenyamanan lingkungan. Suara bising dapat berasal dari suara mesin pabrik, mesin kendaraan dan mesin pesawat. Hilangnya pendengaran manusia dimulai pada tingkat kebisingan 80-90db selama delapan jam, pada tongkat 120db akan membuat telinga sakit dan dapat membunuh manusia pada tingkat 180db.
Peran manusia menanggulangi pencemaran suara:

  • Membuat dinding kedap suara
  • Menanam tananam yang dapat meredam suara sekitar rumah
  • Mesin-mesin yang dapat mengeluarkan suara bising haruslah dilengkapi peredam suara
  • Para pekerja haruslah menggunakan penutup telinga untuk mencegah telinga tuli.

RPP TEMATIK

Rencanan Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran
(RPP)  Tematik


Nama Sekolah     :  .................................
Tema                    :  Lingkungan
Kelas/Semester    :  III / 1
Alokasi Waktu     :  3 minggu

I. STANDAR KOMPETENSI

I.
PKn

1.
Mengamalkan makna Sumpah Pemuda

II.
IPS

1.
Memahami lingkungan dan melaksanakan kerjasama di sekitar rumah dan sekolah

III.
Bahasa Indonesia

Mendengarkan

1.
Memahami penjelasan tentang petunjuk dan cerita anak yang dilisankan

Berbicara

2.
Mengungkapkan pikiran, perasaan, pengalaman, dan petunjuk dengan bercerita
dan memberikan tanggapan/ saran

IV.
Matematika

1.
Melakukan operasi hitung bilangan sampai tiga angka

V.
IPA

1.
Memahami ciri-ciri dan kebutuhan makhluk hidup serta hal-hal yang mempengaruhi
perubahan pada makhluk hidup

II. KOMPETENSI DASAR

1. PKn             : - Mengamalkan makna satu nusa, satu bangsa dan satu bahasa
- Mengamalkan nilai-nilai Sumpah Pemuda dalam kehidupan sehari-  
  sehari

2. IPS              : - Menceritakan lingkungan alam dan buatan di sekitar rumah dan
    sekolah
                                - Membuat denah dan peta lingkungan rumah dan sekolah

3. B. Indonesia            : - Melakukan sesuatu berdasarkan penjelasan yang disampaikan secara
    lisan
  - Mengomentari tokoh-tokoh cerita anak yang disampaikan secara lisan
  - Menceritakan pengalaman yang mengesankan dengan menggunakan
    kalimat yang runtut dan mudah dipahami

4. Matematika : Melakukan operasi hitung bilangan sampai tiga angka

5. IPA             : - Mengidentifikasi ciri-ciri dan kebutuhan makhluk hidup
- Mendeskripsikan perubahan yang terjadi pada makhluk hidup dan hal-
  hal yang mempengaruhi pertumbuhan dan perkembangan anak

  (makanan, kesehatan, rekreasi, dan olah raga)

Pembelajaran Terpadu


 Pengertian
Istilah Pembelajaran Terpadu berasal dari kata “ integrated teaching and learning” atau “ integrated curriculum approach ”. Konsep ini telah lama dikemukakan oleh John Dewey sebagai usaha untuk mengintegrasikan perkembangan dan pertumbuhan siswa dan kemampuan pengetahuannya ( Beans, 1993).
Pada perspektif bahasa, pembelajaran terpadu sering diartikan sebagai pendekatan tematik ( thematic approach ). Pembelajaran terpadu didefinisikan sebagai proses dan strategi yang mengintegrasikan isi bahasa (membaca, menulis, berbicara dan mendengar) dan mengkaitkannya dengan mata pelajaran lain. Konsep ini mengintegrasikan bahasa (language arts content) sebagai pusat pembelajaran yang dihubungkan dengan berbagai tema atau topik pembelajaran.
Pembelajaran terpadu juga sering disebut pembelajaran koheren ( a coherent curriculum approach ) yang memandang bahwa pembelajaran terpadu merupakan pendekatan untuk mengembangkan program pembelajaran yang menyatukan dan menghubungkan berbagai program pendidikan. Keterhubungan dalam kurikulum bukan hanya antara mata pelajaran dan kebutuhan serta minat dan bakat anak, tetapi juga menghubungkan antara tujuan dan kegiatan, serta kondisi masyarakat pada umumnya.
Definisi lain tentang pembelajaran terpadu adalah pendekatan holistik ( a holitic approach ) yang mengkombinasikan aspek efistemologi, sosial, psikologi dan pendekatan paedagogi untuk pendidikan anak, yaitu menghubungkan antara otak dan otot, antara individu dan individu, antara individu dan komunitas, dan antara domain-domain pengetahuan. (Udin Syaefudin Sa’ud, Ph.D, 2006 ).
Menurut para pakar pendidikan pembelajaran terpadu sangat tepat diterapkan pada sekolah dasar, karena pada jenjang pendidikan dasar siswa memahami dan menghayati pengalamannya masih secara totalitas serta masih sulit menghadapi pemilahan dan pemisahan yang artificial. Keterpaduan dalam pembelajaran ini dapat dilihat dari asfek proses atau waktu, aspek bahan ajar dan asfek kegiatan belajar mengajar.
 Model-Model Pembelajaran Terpadu
Model Pembelajaran Terpadu pada dasarnya merupakan suatu system pembelajaran yang memungkinkan siswa baik secara individu maupun secara kolektif, aktif menggali dan menemukan konsep serta prinsif-prinsif keilmuan secara holistic, bermakna dan otentik .
Dilihat dari cara memadukan konsep, keterampilan, topik, dan unit tematiknya, menurut seorang pakar pendidikan yang bernama Robin Fogarty (1991) ada sepuluh cara atau model dalam merencanakan pembelajaran terpadu yaitu : (1) Model Fragmented (2) Model Connected (3) Model Nested (4) Model Sequenced (5) Model Shared (6) Model Webbed (7) Model Threaded (8) Model Integrated (9) Model Immersed dan (10) Model Networked. Secara ringkas kesepuluh model tersebut akan penulis jelaskan.
1.      Model Fragmented adalah model pembelajaran tradisional yang memilah dan memisahkan disiplin ilmu atas beberapa mata pelajaran tanpa memadukan atau mengaitkan satu sama lain.
2.      Model Connected (keterhubungan) dilandasi oleh anggapan bahwa butir-butir pembelajaran dapat dipayungkan pada induk mata pelajaran tertentu. Menata butir-butir pembelajaran dan proses pembelajarannya secara terpadu.
3.      Model Nested merupakan pemaduan berbagai bentuk penguasaan konsep keterampilan melalui sebuah kegiatan pembelajaran dengan mengembangkan daya imajinasi dan berpikir logis untuk menunjukkan bentuk kemampuan keterampilan tertentu.
4.      Model Sequenced merupakan model pemaduan topik-topik antar mata pelajaran yang berbeda secara paralel dengan cara mengajarkan materi pelajaran yang memiliki kesamaan materi dan keterkaitan antar keduanya.
5.      Model Shared merupakan bentuk pemaduan pembelajaran akibat adanya overlapping konsep atau ide pada dua mata pelajaran atau lebih sehingga menuntun siswa untuk membuka wawasan dan cara berpikir yang luas dan mendalam melalui pemahaman terhadap konsep secara lintas disiplin ilmu.
6.      Model Webbed (jaring laba-laba) bertolak dari pendekatan tematik sebagi pemadu bahan dan kegiatan pembelajaran yang memiliki keterkaitan materi yang secara metodologis dapat dipadukan dengan memilih dan memilak tema / pokok bahasan yang kemudian tema utama tersebut disebarkan ke dalam berbagai mata pelajaran.
7.      Model Threaded (bergalur) merupakan pendekatan pembelajaran yang ditempuh dengan cara mengembangkan gagasan pokok yang merupakan benang merah (galur) yang berasal dari konsep yang terdapat dalam berbagai disiplin ilmu.
8.      Model Integrated merupakan pemaduan sejumlah topik dari mata pelajaran yang berbeda tetapi esensinya sama dalam sebuah topik tertentu sehingga perlu adanya pengintegrasian multi disiplin yang dapat ditinjau dari berbagai disiplin ilmu dalam pemecahan masalah melalui satu tema sentral.
9.      Model Immersed dirancang untuk membantu siswa dalam menyaring dan memadukan berbagai pengalaman dan pengetahuan dihubungkan dengan medan pemakaiannya melalui pengintegrasian semua data dari setiap mata pelajaran dengan mengaitkan ide-ide melalui minatnya.
10.  Model Networked merupakan model pemaduan pembelajaran yang mengendalikan kemungkinan pengubahan konsep, bentuk pemecahan masalah, maupun bentuk keterampilan baru setelah siswa mengadakan studi lapangan dalam situasi, kondisi dan konteks yang berbeda-beda.
Dari kesepuluh macam model pembelajaran terpadu di atas yang dapat diterapkan dalam kegiatan belajar mengajar disesuaikan dengan kemampuan guru di Indonesia mungkin hanya model pembelajaran webbed (jaring laba-laba) dan model connected (keterhubungan).


UU No.11 tahun 2008 tentang ITE